Environment

Is California water use increasing?

Produced by Aaron Mendelson & Chris Keller | Updated Sept. 7, 2016

August monthly water use by the City Of Redwood City

Water consumption in the City Of Redwood City decreased 1.21 percent in August 2017 compared to August 2016. Overall, consumption in August has decreased 30.87 percent over the past five years.
  • August 2013 241 million gallons
  • August 2014 173 million gallons
  • August 2015 169 million gallons
  • August 2016 167 million gallons
  • August 2017 173 million gallons

Displayed in millions of gallons

Average daily water consumption by each residential customer

About 78.0% of water consumption in the City Of Redwood City is residential. The average daily gallons used by each residential customer increased 1.27 percent in August 2017 compared to August 2016, according to the State Water Resources Control Board.
47.90
average daily gallons
used by each residential
customer for August 2017
47.30
average daily gallons
used by each residential
customer for August 2017

Year-over-year water consumption

January
  • 2013 185 million gallons
  • 2015 194 million gallons
  • 2016 158 million gallons
February
  • 2013 192 million gallons
  • 2015 189 million gallons
  • 2016 187 million gallons
March
  • 2013 252 million gallons
  • 2015 246 million gallons
  • 2016 209 million gallons
April
  • 2013 323 million gallons
  • 2015 225 million gallons
  • 2016 206 million gallons
May
  • 2013 332 million gallons
  • 2015 234 million gallons
  • 2016 257 million gallons
June
  • 2013 385 million gallons
  • 2015 235 million gallons
  • 2016 301 million gallons
July
  • 2013 341 million gallons
  • 2015 293 million gallons
  • 2016 306 million gallons
August
  • 2013 389 million gallons
  • 2015 226 million gallons
  • 2016 271 million gallons
September
  • 2013 303 million gallons
  • 2015 253 million gallons
  • 2016 266 million gallons
October
  • 2013 272 million gallons
  • 2015 218 million gallons
  • 2016 206 million gallons
November
  • 2013 218 million gallons
  • 2015 187 million gallons
  • 2016 191 million gallons
August
  • 2013 241 million gallons
  • 2015 169 million gallons
  • 2016 167 million gallons

Displayed in millions of gallons
2014 water use data is incomplete and therefore not displayed

Progress toward mandatory water reduction*

City Of Redwood City water use decreased by 24.36 percent between June 2015 and February 2016 — the nine months of the initial statewide conservation mandate — achieving a 8 percent reduction.
48.066
billion gallons consumed
over the same months in 2013.
36.358
billion gallons consumed
between June 2015 and February 2016.

*: Approved by the State Water Resources Control Board in 2015, the reduction target was meant to achieve a 25 percent reduction in water use statewide. It is tied to an average July through Sept. 2014 daily per capita residential water use rate that placed water agencies into nine tiers.

Enforcement statistics

Selected enforcement statistics reported by the City Of Redwood City to the State Water Resources Control Board.
Month Watering Days Complaints Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthJuly 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received3 Follow-up Actions3 Warnings Issued3 Penalties Assessed
MonthOctober 2017 Watering Days3 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthSeptember 2017 Watering Days3 Complaints Received4 Follow-up Actions4 Warnings Issued4 Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthJuly 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received1 Follow-up Actions1 Warnings Issued1 Penalties Assessed
MonthJune 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthMay 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthApril 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received1 Follow-up Actions1 Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthMarch 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthFebruary 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthJanuary 2017 Watering Days7 Complaints Received1 Follow-up Actions1 Warnings Issued1 Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2016 Watering Days7 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthNovember 2016 Watering Days7 Complaints Received3 Follow-up Actions3 Warnings Issued3 Penalties Assessed
MonthOctober 2016 Watering Days3 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthSeptember 2016 Watering Days3 Complaints Received4 Follow-up Actions4 Warnings Issued4 Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2016 Watering Days7 Complaints Received4 Follow-up Actions4 Warnings Issued4 Penalties Assessed
MonthJuly 2016 Watering Days7 Complaints Received10 Follow-up Actions10 Warnings Issued10 Penalties Assessed
MonthJune 2016 Watering Days7 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthMay 2016 Watering Days2 Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthApril 2016 Watering Days Complaints Received6 Follow-up Actions6 Warnings Issued6 Penalties Assessed
MonthMarch 2016 Watering Days2 Complaints Received3 Follow-up Actions3 Warnings Issued3 Penalties Assessed
MonthFebruary 2016 Watering Days Complaints Received1 Follow-up Actions1 Warnings Issued1 Penalties Assessed
MonthJanuary 2016 Watering Days2 Complaints Received1 Follow-up Actions1 Warnings Issued1 Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received3 Follow-up Actions3 Warnings Issued3 Penalties Assessed
MonthNovember 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received2 Follow-up Actions2 Warnings Issued2 Penalties Assessed
MonthOctober 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received10 Follow-up Actions10 Warnings Issued10 Penalties Assessed
MonthSeptember 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received22 Follow-up Actions22 Warnings Issued22 Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received23 Follow-up Actions23 Warnings Issued23 Penalties Assessed
MonthJuly 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received34 Follow-up Actions34 Warnings Issued34 Penalties Assessed
MonthJune 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received37 Follow-up Actions37 Warnings Issued37 Penalties Assessed
MonthMay 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received114 Follow-up Actions114 Warnings Issued114 Penalties Assessed
MonthApril 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received51 Follow-up Actions51 Warnings Issued51 Penalties Assessed
MonthMarch 2015 Watering Days2 Complaints Received12 Follow-up Actions12 Warnings Issued12 Penalties Assessed
MonthFebruary 2015 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthJanuary 2015 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthNovember 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthOctober 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthSeptember 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthAugust 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthJuly 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed
MonthJune 2014 Watering Days Complaints Received Follow-up Actions Warnings Issued Penalties Assessed

Here are some ways you can help conserve water

Wash cars with a bucket and sponge

Wash only full loads

Water before 8 a.m. or after 8 p.m.

Capture tap water

About the data: This data is for urban water suppliers and is based on the the most recent reports submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board. Since the gallons of water used per person per day measurement does not take into account rainfall, temperature, humidity and population density, the State Water Resources Control Board discourages comparisons between water suppliers.

comments powered by Disqus